The balance between progressive thinking and conservatism is very fragile and unstable. Finding the "golden mean" between them is not easy, but vital. Leaning towards one or the other direction is fraught with irreversible consequences. Conservatism leads to stagnation and the search for truth through a false path. Excessive zeal with the help of controversial judgments leads to obscurantism, and just like a double conservatism it misleads researchers from the true path.
It is impossible to hypothesize and prove anything without axioms, impossible to discover anything without a flight of thought. Modern science has unfortunately got itself into a vicious circle due to creation of various dogmas, like electricity and radio-waves that hinder science from groundbreaking discoveries. The last 200 years have seen no particular breakthroughs. Most of the discoveries and inventions presented to us nowadays are just modernized and adapted technologies of the past, even information technology.
The current state of the global knowledge could be characterized rather by regression than progress. One of the main reasons for this, is the division of science into fields and branches. A doctor who does not understand anything in mechanics is simply dangerous for patients. A geologist who uses the false theory of evolution of species in his work does not differ much from an astrologer. All this explains, why modern science completely ignores such objects as megaliths.
Those people who don't have a degree in such branches as tectonics, volcanology, geology, petrology, soil science and mineralogy perceive megalithic objects as creations of mind. Those of them who chose a conservative approach, tend to deny any unconventional theories, just becuase they are tought to do so.
Bright-minded people on the other side, would say: "Here, I've told you! These are some relics of the ancient hyperborean civilization! There could be a temple once, where our ancestors conducted spiritual communication sessions with some far planets where they had come from".
Obviously, both abovementioned groups of people look laughable. But what's more embarrassing is that while geologists mock enthusiasts, we lose bunch of precious megalithic objects each year. Allowing to crush grand megalithic blocks with obvious traces of artificial processing under Vyborg, for selling granite to Finland on one hand, and alloting tremendous amounts of money for researching the overly explored egyptian pyramids on the other seems quite short-sighted.
But the problem, unfortunately, lies deeper. It's not just about shortsightedness and professional incompetence of scientists. Over the years of digging into this issue, I have encountered quite a few facts about deliberate concealment of information by official science and authorities. I can not assert that there is some international conspiracy behind it, but I as well can not exclude an explanation that involves a co-operation between various government and non-government organizations united by UNESCO, aimed to undermine any past or ongoing research into megalithic objects. There were more than enough reasons for such suspicions.
The first encounter with the conspiracy happened long time ago, when I just met A.Y. Sklyarov (now deceased). His reaction was just stunning: "Forget it. You don't need troubles."
But it was just the beginning in the further chain of events, which led to a number of anonymous threats that I received via email. Some of those letters even disappeared themselves, hinting at a possible interference by people with hacking abilities, which in its turn made me suspect that there might be some influential people invloved in it.
It became clear that suspicions were not groundless. And if so, the sense of dealing with this issue got more relevant than ever. We are on the right track. Yes, we do not have enough specialists, tools, access to databases, and trivial funds for conducting serious research. But has it ever been the decisive factor? No. Therefore, me and my friends and colleagues around the world, independently continue to rake up the debris from lies and conjectures, and continue to accumulate and systematize information about the so-called megaliths (megalithic remnants).
The day will come when all the data we've been accumulating will let us create a laboratory for researching megaliths on a strictly scientific basis, not just an amateur one. And while there is no organized force, capable of resisting official science and authorities, the only remaining thing to do is to continue doing what's been done. Accumulate and systematize, share the information with the public, in hope to ignite more interest in ordinary people and eventually make the concealment of true information impossible.
My first publication about megalithic objects was an article about the remnants at the Armansky passage near Magadan ("Machu Picchu and Magadan - Brother Cities") . But I'd like to continue with a story about a place called Bayanaul, located in Pavlodar region of Kazakhstan. Particularly about Bayanaul National Park.
The park was founded in 1985, making it Kazakhstan's first national reserve. It was created to preserve and restore the natural flora and fauna found in the Bayanaul mountain range. The park's total area is 68,453 hectares, which includes various recreation centers and tourist attractions, like lakes Jasybay and Toraygir.
Bayanaul mountains stretch for 40 - 50 km from west to east, 20 - 25 km from north to south. The highest point is Mount Akbet, reaching 1026 meters. Mountain-forest oasis occupies an area of 450 km² and attracts tourists by quaint rocks, beautiful lakes, caves and grottoes, steep narrow gorges.
Does it remind you of anything? For the umpteenth time, in places with "wonderful monuments of natural architecture" we find mountains, which turn out to look so much like transmitting devices. More precisely, like parabolic long-distance communication antennas.
The scale of deterioration is surely enormous, however, imagination easily "paints" the original look.
Legends about Tartary, which fell through the ground, begin to acquire visible lines. And the reason for it to "fall", was not just the destructive impact of natural erosion, lasting for millions of years, but rather some catastrophic processes that have led to massive changes in continents' shape and elevation, turning mountains into stony plateaus and rising the seabed.
Geologists say that isolated rock blocks remain after the destruction of some more unstable rocks by any exogenous factors, such as weathering, erosion, water impact, etc. And in fact they are right. But I am sure that these rocks are remnants, and I would even say - remnants of something, not necessarily of natural origin, or, not only natural.
The process of formation of the remnants is quite understandable, but the hole in the rock looks rather strange. Such holes are found quite often. Moreover, sometimes, the edges of such holes have clear beads of regular cylindrical shape, differing in mineral composition from the rock in which they are contained. Personally for me, there is virtually no doubt that these are real pipes that literally diffused into the surrounding monolith wall.
This photo vividly shows how the water level in the lakes drops. It is quite clear that not so long ago, a large part of the complex was under water. It is the water that gave the granite such rounded forms.
The supposed boundaries of the ancient sea, on whose bank the megalithic city was located, are marked with a blue marker.
It is obvious that the formerly horizontal structure was overturned during tectonic squeezing and now lies as if being on its side. Structures that have deviated from the horizon less, are preserved better.
You don't need much imagination to see an ancient wall, whose right wing has tilted and gone underground, exposing a break in the center. Natural erosion completed the process of transforming a megalithic building into a nature reserve.
Geologists say that spreading magma creates such layers of varying thickness and then freezes. Then another layer of lava is spilled onto the cooled layer, which, when frozen, creates another layer. And then, a ready-made multilayered "cake" consisting of original stone layers begins to crack in the course of time, creating vertical "seams" that are usually taken by amateurs for stonework. And this is what I agree on with geologists. The external similarity with stonework should not lead us astray. Then why do I assert that we have an artificial creation before us? It is a question to be explained thoroughly, but a bit later.